中国科技术语 ›› 2008, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3): 5-10.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2008.03.016

• 术语学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

试论术语标准化的辩证法*

郑述谱   

  1. 郑述谱:黑龙江大学俄语语言文学研究中心,150080
  • 出版日期:2008-06-25 发布日期:2008-06-25
  • 基金资助:
    本文为教育部人文社科重点研究基地2005年重大研究项目(05JJD740180)中期研究成果。

  • Online:2008-06-25 Published:2008-06-25

摘要: 为了实现术语标准化,人们对术语提出了一系列要求,诸如单义性、简短性、理据性、系统性等,但这些要求是否都合理且又符合实际?为什么一方面强调标准化的深远意义,另一方面,却总是有大量违反标准的现象存在与发生,这背后有没有更为深刻的原因在起作用?文章试图以俄罗斯的实践为例,以辩证法为依据,来回答上述问题。这对建立更符合唯物辩证法原理的标准化观点是会有帮助的。

关键词: 术语, 标准化, 辩证法

Abstract: A set of requirements have been raised for terminology standardization, such as monosemy, conciseness, motivation, systematicness and so on. The author wonders whether or not these requirements are rational and simultaneously correspond to reality, and why such a lot of violation standardization things exist and often happen, when the far-reaching meaning is so emphasized. There should be any profound reason. This paper attempts to answer these questions, using the examples from Russia on the basis of dialectical method. It would be helpful to establish a dialectical point of view in terminology standardization.

Key words: terminology, standardization, dialectics