Visual Analysis of the Literature on Eye Tracking Technology from the Perspective of High Frequency Terminology

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2021.01.010

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper uses high frequency terminology analysis method to take 217 literature records of eye tracking learning research published in the SSCI journals from 2009 to 2019 as data sources, and uses the knowledge graph analysis software called CiteSpace to visually analyze the data sources. According to the clustering situation of keywords and terms, this paper explores the research hotspots in the field of eye tracking technology from the perspectives of “reading comprehension”, “language acquisition”, “multimedia application”, and “information behavior”, and predicts the trends of hot terms in future research.

Key words: eye tracking, learning research, knowledge map, research hotspots

CLC Number: (术语规范及交流)

SUN Xin, ZHAN Qinglong. Visual Analysis of the Literature on Eye Tracking Technology from the Perspective of High Frequency Terminology[J]. China Terminology, 2021, 23(1): 71-80.

Figures/Tables 5

References 22

[1]	冯小燕, 王志军, 吴向文. 我国教育技术领域眼动研究的现状与趋势分析[J]. 中国远程教育, 2016(10):22-29.
[2]	李杰, 陈超美. CiteSpace:科技文本挖掘及可视化[M]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学出版社, 2016: 2-3.
[3]	蒋鑫, 朱红艳, 洪明. 美国“教育中的人工智能”研究:回溯与评析[J]. 中国远程教育, 2020(2):9-20,48.
[4]	梁少博, 吴丹, 董晶, 等. 跨设备搜索引擎结果页面注意力分布研究:基于眼动视觉数据的实证分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2018(1):4,15,27-35.
[5]	许洁, 王豪龙. 阅读行为眼动跟踪研究综述[J]. 出版科学, 2020,28(2):52-66.
[6]	ZHAN Z, WU J, MEI H, et al. Gender Differences in Eye Movements During Online Reading[M]// Simon K S, Jiao J L, Lee L K, et al.Technology in Education:Pedagogical Innovations.Singapore:Springer, 2019:235-243.
[7]	BAHMAN, ABDI, SARGEZEH, et al. Gender-based eye movement differences in passive indoor picture viewing: An eye-tracking study[J]. Physiology & Behavior, 2019,206:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.03.023 URL pmid: 30922820
[8]	WANG J X, LI L, LI S, et al. Adult Age Differences in Eye Movements During Reading:The Evidence From Chinese[J]. Journals of Gerontology Series B:Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences. 2018,73(4):584-593.
[9]	AMADIEU F, TRICOT A, MARINE C. Interaction between prior knowledge and concept-map structure on hypertext comprehension, coherence of reading orders and disorientation[J]. Interacting with Computers, 2010,22(2):88-97.
[10]	毛刚, 何文涛, 俞向军. 基于数字足迹的阅读元认知投入研究[J]. 数字教育, 2020,6(2):38-43.
[11]	王雨. 大学生数字化阅读的影响因素研究[D]. 南京: 江苏师范大学, 2014:69-70,75-76,81.
[12]	MASULLI F, GALLUCCIO M, GERARD C L, et al. Effect of different font sizes and of spaces between words on eye movement performance:An eye tracker study in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children[J]. Vision Research. 2018,153:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.008 URL pmid: 30291918
[13]	BEYMER D, ORTON P Z, RUSSELL D M. An Eye Tracking Study of How Pictures Influence Online Reading[C]. Human-computer Interaction-interact, Ifip Tc 13 International Conference, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, September, Part II. DBLP, 2007:456-460.
[14]	MASON L, PLUCHINO P, TORNATORA M C. Eye-movement modeling of integrative reading of an illustrated text: Effects on processing and learning[J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2015,41:172-187.
[15]	张冰, 张敏. 数字阅读必然会导致浅阅读吗?:基于眼动追踪技术的数字阅读与纸质阅读对比实证分析[J]. 新闻传播, 2013(1):52-53.
[16]	BISSON M J, HEUVEN V, CONKLIN K, et al. Processing of native and foreign language subtitles in films: An eye tracking study[J]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2014,35(2):399-418.
[17]	PEREZ M M, PETERS E, DESMET P. Enhancing Vocabulary Learning Through Captioned Video: An Eye-Tracking Study[J]. Modern Language Journal, 2015,99(2):308-328.
[18]	李晶, 陈志燕, 陈明红. 眼动追踪实验法在信息行为领域的应用研究[J]. 情报学报, 2020,39(1):90-99.
[19]	陈庆荣, 王梦娟, 刘慧凝, 等. 语言认知中眼动和ERP结合的理论技术路径及其应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011,19(2):264-273.
[20]	张海丛, 王梅, 程建波. 基于眼动的孤独症儿童对常见手势反应的研究[J]. 北京联合大学学报, 2020,34(2):56-61.
[21]	马杰. 发展性阅读障碍儿童新词学习能力的眼动研究[D]. 天津:天津师范大学, 2018.
[22]	王志军, 王雪. 多媒体画面语言学理论体系的构建研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2015(7):42-48.

	排名	频次	中心度	关键词
1	169	0.08	eye tracking	眼动追踪
2	40	0.16	attention	注意力
3	37	0.12	picture	图片
4	36	0.13	comprehension	理解
5	33	0.10	information	信息
6	33	0.14	cognitive load	认知负荷
7	26	0.09	performance	表现
8	23	0.02	student	学生
9	23	0.03	text	文本
10	22	0.12	knowledge	知识

	排名	频次	中心度	关键词
1	169	0.08	eye tracking	眼动追踪
2	40	0.16	attention	注意力
3	37	0.12	picture	图片
4	36	0.13	comprehension	理解
5	33	0.10	information	信息
6	33	0.14	cognitive load	认知负荷
7	26	0.09	performance	表现
8	23	0.02	student	学生
9	23	0.03	text	文本
10	22	0.12	knowledge	知识