“Prospects of a Philosophy of Terminology” by Prof. Budin

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2018.06.004

China Terminology ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 22-27.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2018.06.004

• Research on Terminology • Previous Articles Next Articles

“Prospects of a Philosophy of Terminology” by Prof. Budin

QIU Bihua

Received:2018-02-26 Revised:2018-08-30 Online:2018-12-25 Published:2019-01-09

Abstract

Abstract:

In 2003,“the colloquium comparison of the theoretical foundations of terminology in eastern Europe and the western countries” organized by the International Institute for Terminology Research (IITF)was held. On the occasion of this conference, terminology scholars from Eastern and Western Europa aired their views freely. Russian terminology expert Larissa Alexeeva delivered a presentation entitled “Interaction between Terminology and Philosophy”. Prof. Gerhard Budin, the vice-president of IITF made a speech named “Prospects of a Philosophy of Terminology”, which focused on the legacy of Austrian philosophy and its impact on the historical development of the theory of terminology. The theoretical relationship between terminology and the knowledge engineering, as well as with the knowledge ontology had also been analyzed. The aim of this article is to try to introduce the main opinions expressed by Prof. Budin for the Chinese readers.

Key words: philosophy of terminology, knowledge engineering, knowledge ontology, epistemology, realist ontology

CLC Number:

QIU Bihua. “Prospects of a Philosophy of Terminology” by Prof. Budin[J]. China Terminology, 2018, 20(6): 22-27.

References 9

[1]	Alexeeva L M. Interaction between Terminology and Philosophy[M]. The Theoretical Foundations of Terminology Comparison between Easteren Europe and Western Countries.Würzburg:Ergon Verlag,2006.
[2]	Budin G. Terminologie und Wissenstechnik als Angewandte Wissenschaftstheorie-Entwicklungsstand und Perspektiven:Festschrift für Erhard Oeser zum 60.Geburtstag[M]. Wien:Peter Lang Verlag,2000: 29-41.
[3]	Hempel C. Aspects of Scientific Explanation[M]. New York: Free Press,1965.
[4]	Rey A. Essays on Terminology[M]. Amsterdam/Philadphia:John Benjamins,1995.
[5]	Whewell W. History of the History of the Inductive Sciences[M]. London: Cambridge University Press,2010(First published in:1837).
[6]	Thagard P. Conceptual Revolutions[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press,1992.
[7]	Frege G. Über Sinn und Bedeutung[J].Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, 1892,100:25-50.
[8]	Locke J. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding[C]//Edited by Alexander C F. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1894.
[9]	Oeser E, Budin G. Controlled Conceptual Dynamics: From “Ordinary Language” to Scientific Terminology-and Back[J]. Terminology Science and Research, 1995(2):3-17.

“Prospects of a Philosophy of Terminology” by Prof. Budin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 9

Related Articles 4

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LIU Zhi, HAO Kejun. Design and Implementation of Weather Modification Terminology Ontology Knowledge Base based on Protégé [J]. China Terminology, 2019, 21(6): 17-23.
[2]	QI Qi, ZHANG Keliang. Design and Construction of Ontology Knowledge Base on South China Sea: Toward Terminology Translation [J]. China Terminology, 2018, 20(4): 19-25.
[3]	QIU Bihua. French Scholars' Contribution to Modern Terminology: from the Perspective of Intersection of Terminology and Ontology [J]. China Terminology, 2016, 18(5): 19-24.
[4]	YI Mianzhu, LIU Wuying, LIU Wanyi, WANG Lin. Research on Multilingual Abbreviated Terms Bank for National Defense [J]. China Terminology, 2013, 15(5): 18-21.