中国科技术语 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 65-73.doi: 10.12339/j.issn.1673-8578.2024.03.008

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

在线术语库评价标准研究

梁潇()   

  1. 深圳市市政设计研究院有限公司轨道交通院,广东深圳 518031
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30 修回日期:2024-01-30 出版日期:2024-07-05 发布日期:2024-07-05
  • 作者简介:

    梁潇(1990—), 女,硕士,深圳市政设计研究院有限公司轨道交通院工程师。研究方向为应用术语学、工程术语标准化。参与了深圳市地铁12号线等项目的设计工作,主持研究深圳机场地铁站线的标准化工作。通信方式:

Research on Evaluation Criteria for Online Terminological Databases

LIANG Xiao()   

  • Received:2023-11-30 Revised:2024-01-30 Online:2024-07-05 Published:2024-07-05

摘要:

随着网络技术发展,人们需要对在线术语库的质量进行评价。本项研究旨在对各类在线术语库进行归类,继而对术语库的质量进行评价,从而建立科学的评价体系。文章研究了在当前在线术语库不断涌现的情况下,如何客观有效地评价术语库和建立评价标准体系。采用文献法与分类法,分析了国内外关于术语库方面的文献,对一些术语库实例进行了分类研究。结果表明分类法能够对术语库进行归类、描述与评价,帮助分辨与确认不同类型的术语库资源,促进专业领域的交流。

关键词: 在线术语库, 评价体系, 翻译工具, 概念派, 数据类目

Abstract:

With the development of online technology, an evaluation of the quality of the term bases is required. This paper discusses how to make an objective and effective assessment of the term bases and build an evaluation criteria system in the current trend of the rapid emergence of online terminology databases. Using methods of documentation and classification, we analyzed the literature regarding terminological data banks and carried out categorization study on some examples of term banks. The study aims at facilitating the classification of the various types of online term bases, and then carry out the evaluation of the quality of the term bases so as to establish a scientific evaluation system. Our results show that classification can contribute to the categorization, description and evaluation of the term bases, which will be a help to identify and validate different types of term bank resources and improve communication in the specialized field.

Key words: online terminological database, evaluation system, translation tools, concept approach, data categories