中国科技术语 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 43-47.doi: 10.12339/j.issn.1673-8578.2025.06.008

• 定名研讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

对信息整合理论中信息概念的追问

王博阳1(), 肖森迪2   

  1. 1 山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心, 山西太原 030006
    2 西安外事学院, 陕西西安 710077
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-19 出版日期:2025-11-05 发布日期:2025-11-04
  • 作者简介:

    王博阳(1997—),男,山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心硕士研究生,研究方向为技术哲学与STS、信息哲学。通信方式:

    肖森迪(1996—),男,硕士,西安外事学院马克思主义学院专职教师,研究方向为当代知识论、复杂系统哲学。

Questioning the Concept of Information in the Theory of Information Integration

WANG Boyang1(), XIAO Sendi2   

  • Received:2025-05-19 Online:2025-11-05 Published:2025-11-04

摘要:

信息整合理论(integrated information theory,简称IIT)是将整合信息视为意识构成的基础理论。在3.0版本中,托诺尼将信息设定为构成内在差异的因果机制,从而与香农信息相区分。塞尔认为这种观察者相关信息无法区分内外,因为一切因果信息都在先被识别或建构。展开论证者认为塞尔的批评忽视了科学研究的客观性,提出针对IIT反馈网络模型的批评,认为因果信息的判断仍是从输入输出两端考虑,无法摆脱机制黑箱。操作主义通过将因果转换为操作的连续性,以时间概念来摆脱因果信息的判断问题,从而为IIT提供弱辩护。

关键词: 信息整合理论, 整合信息, 泛心论, 因果信息

Abstract:

Integrated information theory(IIT)posits integrated information as the foundational basis for consciousness.In its 3.0 version,Tononi conceptualizes information as causal mechanisms constituting intrinsic differences,thereby distinguishing it from Shannon information.Searle argues that such observer-dependent information cannot differentiate intrinsic and extrinsic aspects,as all causal information must be recognized or constructed firstly.Proponents counter that Searle’s critique overlooks the objectivity of scientific research,while raising criticisms specifically targeting IIT’s feedback network model.They contend that judgments about causal information still rely on input-output analysis,failing to transcend the mechanistic black box.Operationalism offers a modest defense for IIT by reframing causality as operational continuity through temporal concepts,thereby circumventing the epistemological challenges of causal information judgment.

Key words: integrated information theory, integration information, panpsychism, causal information