物联网和智慧城市数据处理与管理概念体系构建——以ITU-T 数据处理与管理焦点组标准化项目为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2021.02.010

中国科技术语 ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 70-80.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2021.02.010

• • 上一篇

物联网和智慧城市数据处理与管理概念体系构建——以ITU-T 数据处理与管理焦点组标准化项目为例

魏玮(), 安小米()

中国人民大学信息资源管理学院, 北京 100872
数据工程与知识工程教育部重点实验室, 北京 100872
中国人民大学智慧城市研究中心, 北京 100872

收稿日期:2021-01-10 修回日期:2021-03-07 出版日期:2021-04-25 发布日期:2021-04-07
通讯作者: 安小米 E-mail:37952385@qq.com;anxiaomi@ruc.edu.cn
作者简介:
安小米(1965—),女,教授,IEC智慧城市系统委员会术语工作组召集人,ISO/IEC JTC1/WG11智慧城市工作组注册专家及其智慧城市的数据利用任务组召集人、ISO/TC268/SC1/WG4智慧城市基础设施分技术委员会数据交换与共享工作组注册专家、ISO/TC46/SC11主席顾问组委员及其术语任务负责人,IEC-ISO-ITU-T智慧城市通用任务联合工作组委员,《中国科技术语》编委。通信方式:anxiaomi@ruc.edu.cn。
魏玮(1988—),男,中国人民大学博士研究生,IEC 智慧城市系统委员会术语工作组注册专家,ISO/TC268/SC1/WG4 智慧城市基础设施分技术委员会数据交换与共享工作组注册专家,研究方向为知识管理与国际标准中的智慧城市术语构建研究方法论研究。通信方式:37952385@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“面向政府大数据资源治理与共享的数据质量管理标准研究”(92046017)

Concept System Building for Data Processing and Management for IoT and Smart Cities and Communities: Case from ITU-T FG-DPM Projects

WEI Wei(), AN Xiaomi()

Information Resource Management School, Renmin University of China (RUC),Beijing 100872
Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (RUC), Ministry of Education,Beijing 100872
Smart City Research Centre of RUC ,Beijing 100872

Received:2021-01-10 Revised:2021-03-07 Online:2021-04-25 Published:2021-04-07
Contact: AN Xiaomi E-mail:37952385@qq.com;anxiaomi@ruc.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

概念体系构建和术语工作是制定任何标准的基础,在多学科和多领域的场景中,构建概念体系和术语工作面临不同利益相关方需求不同而难以达成共识的巨大挑战。文章梳理了ITU-T FG-DPM 在促进不同利益相关方和项目组成员之间达成通用概念共识构建统一术语及定义的经验,通过规范概念体系的构建过程,采用术语多维度协同视角来构建统一的数据处理与管理概念体系,促进了工作组和项目组内外在物联网与智慧城市领域数据处理与管理方面达成共识。文章对多学科多领域场景的概念体系构建和术语工作具有一定参考意义,并不局限于物联网和智慧城市领域。

关键词: 概念体系构建, 术语工作, 数据处理与管理, 物联网和智慧城市, ITU-T

Abstract:

Concept system building and terminology work is the foundation for standards making. Terminology work faces grand challenges when its development across multi-discipline and multi-domain. This paper describes the empirical processes of concept system building and terminology work of ITU-T FG-DPM, and introduces a multi-dimensional standards cooperation approach for building a single and unified DPM concept system to facilitate consistency of common understanding about DPM across different working groups and projects. This research has many implications to concept system building and terminology work across multi-discipline and multi-domain, not limited to IoT, smart cities and communities.

Key words: concept system building, terminology work, data processing and management, IoT and smart cities and communities, ITU-T

中图分类号:

魏玮, 安小米. 物联网和智慧城市数据处理与管理概念体系构建——以ITU-T 数据处理与管理焦点组标准化项目为例[J]. 中国科技术语, 2021, 23(2): 70-80.

WEI Wei, AN Xiaomi. Concept System Building for Data Processing and Management for IoT and Smart Cities and Communities: Case from ITU-T FG-DPM Projects[J]. China Terminology, 2021, 23(2): 70-80.

图/表 19

参考文献 18

[1]	ITU-T FG-DPM. Focus Group on Data Processing and Management to support IoT and Smart Cities & Communities: SharePoint. [DB/OL].(2019-07)[2020-01-01]. https://extranet.itu.int/sites/itu-t/focusgroups/dpm/SitePages/Home.aspx.
[2]	LI Y. Concept system of terminology of information science and information technologies-A preliminary study[D]. Beijing:Beijing Language and Culture University, 2003.
[3]	ZHANG Y F, QIN X W. How to build science concept system[J]. Journal of Physics Teaching, 2016,34(7):41-44.
[4]	ISO 704:2009. Terminology work—Principles and methodsSO 704:2009. Terminology work—Principles and methods[S]. Switzerland, 2009.
[5]	MARI L, GOODWIN J, JACOBSON E, et al. The definitions of the base units in the revised SI: A terminological analysis[J]. Measurement, 2019,150:106976.
[6]	OUYANG J G. Theory building of core concept and concept system[J]. Journal platform of central China Normal University (Journal of Social Sciences), 2006(3):31-37.
[7]	ISO/IEC Directives Part 1 + IEC Supplement:2020, Procedures for the technical work-Procedures specific to IEC, Annex SK (normative)-Rules for terminology work[S]. Switzerland, 2020: 111-139.
[8]	ITU-T FG-DPM Technical Specification D0.1:2019, “Data Processing and Management for IoT and Smart Cities and Communities: Vocabulary”[S]. Switzerland, 2019.
[9]	ITU-T FG-DPM Technical Specification D0.2:2019. “Data processing and management for IoT and smart cities and communities: methodology for data processing and management concept building”[S]. Switzerland, 2019.
[10]	SAGER J C. Practical course in terminology processing[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1990.
[11]	WRIGHT S E, BUDIN G(eds.). Handbook of terminology management: application-oriented terminology management[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001.
[12]	ISO 10241-1:2011, Terminological entries in standards-Part 1: General requirements and examples for presentation[S]. Switzerland, 2019.
[13]	SONG Y, AN X M. Analysis on the Concepts and Conceptual Systems of Smart City in International Standards Based on Terminology Definitions of ISO, ITU-T and IEC[J]. Standard Science, 2018(1):127-132.
[14]	HIGGINS S. The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model[C]. Acm/ieee-cs Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM, 2008.
[15]	ITU-T FG-DPM Technical Specification D1.1:2019. “Use case analysis and requirements for Data Processing and Management to support IoT and Smart Cities and Communities”[S]. Switzerland, 2019.
[16]	ITU-T FG-DPM Technical Specification D2.1:2019, “Data processing and management framework for IoT and smart cities and communities”[S]. Switzerland, 2019.
[17]	ISO 860:2007, Terminology work-Harmonization of concepts and terms[S]. Switzerland, 2007.
[18]	ISO 1087:2019, Terminology work and terminology science-Vocabulary[S]. Switzerland, 2019.

Stages	Formal meeting held	Deliverables	Number of terms
Initial/defining stage	1st Geneva meeting, 17-19, JUL, 2017 2nd Geneva meeting, 20-25, OCT, 2017	N/A FG-DPM-I-098R1 (D0.1)	N/A Initial one contained 26 terms
Extension and selection stage	3rd Brussels meeting, 20-23, FEB, 2018 3rd Brussels meeting, 20-23, FEB, 2018	FG-DPM-I-111 (D0.1) FG-DPM-O-55R1 (D0.1)	Extension to 134 terms Modified to 136 terms
Justification stage	4th Cairo meeting, 1-3, MAY, 2018	FG-DPM-I-160 (D0.1)	Modified to 130 terms
	4th Cairo meeting, 1-3, MAY, 2018	FG-DPM-O-072 (D0.1)	Modified to 130 terms
Continuous justification and application stage	5th Tunis meeting, 17-20, SEP, 2018	FG-DPM-I-178 (D0.1)	A survey of the most commonly used 30 terms for agreements
	5th Tunis meeting, 17-20, SEP, 2018	FG-DPM-O-072 (D0.1)	130 terms identified
	6th Seoul meeting, 14-18, JAN, 2019	FG-DPM-I-223 (D0.1)	72 terms mapped from 12 use cases
	6th Seoul meeting, 14-18, JAN, 2019	FG-DPM-O-113 (D0.1)	176 terms justified
Harmonisation and cooperation stage	7th Geneva meeting, 3-7, APR, 2019	FG-DPM-I-250 (D0.1)
		FG-DPM-I-251 (D0.2)	Terminology work separated into two components
Stages	Formal meeting held	Deliverables	Number of terms
			194 terms were extended in use
	7th Geneva meeting, 3-7, APR, 2019	FG-DPM-O-140R1(D0.1)
		FG-DPM-O-144 (D0.2)	the most commonly used 30 terms were agreed upon
			5 dimensions approach to concept system building were agreed upon: governance;ecosystem;data trust; data lifecycle; data commercialization
	8th Geneva meeting, 16-19, JUL, 2019	FG-DPM-O-172 (D0.1)
		FG-DPM-I-283 (D0.2)	41 terms justified in use
			Consensus achieved of a concept system building with 5 dimensions:governance;ecosystem;data trust;data lifecycle;data commercialization
	8th Geneva meeting, 16-19, JUL, 2019	FG-DPM-TS D0.1
		FG-DPM-TR D0.2	38 core terms agreed upon for common use
			Consensus achieved of a concept system building with 5 dimensional: governance; ecosystem; data trust; data lifecycle; data commercialization

Stages	Formal meeting held	Deliverables	Number of terms
Initial/defining stage	1st Geneva meeting, 17-19, JUL, 2017 2nd Geneva meeting, 20-25, OCT, 2017	N/A FG-DPM-I-098R1 (D0.1)	N/A Initial one contained 26 terms
Extension and selection stage	3rd Brussels meeting, 20-23, FEB, 2018 3rd Brussels meeting, 20-23, FEB, 2018	FG-DPM-I-111 (D0.1) FG-DPM-O-55R1 (D0.1)	Extension to 134 terms Modified to 136 terms
Justification stage	4th Cairo meeting, 1-3, MAY, 2018	FG-DPM-I-160 (D0.1)	Modified to 130 terms
	4th Cairo meeting, 1-3, MAY, 2018	FG-DPM-O-072 (D0.1)	Modified to 130 terms
Continuous justification and application stage	5th Tunis meeting, 17-20, SEP, 2018	FG-DPM-I-178 (D0.1)	A survey of the most commonly used 30 terms for agreements
	5th Tunis meeting, 17-20, SEP, 2018	FG-DPM-O-072 (D0.1)	130 terms identified
	6th Seoul meeting, 14-18, JAN, 2019	FG-DPM-I-223 (D0.1)	72 terms mapped from 12 use cases
	6th Seoul meeting, 14-18, JAN, 2019	FG-DPM-O-113 (D0.1)	176 terms justified
Harmonisation and cooperation stage	7th Geneva meeting, 3-7, APR, 2019	FG-DPM-I-250 (D0.1)
		FG-DPM-I-251 (D0.2)	Terminology work separated into two components
Stages	Formal meeting held	Deliverables	Number of terms
			194 terms were extended in use
	7th Geneva meeting, 3-7, APR, 2019	FG-DPM-O-140R1(D0.1)
		FG-DPM-O-144 (D0.2)	the most commonly used 30 terms were agreed upon
			5 dimensions approach to concept system building were agreed upon: governance;ecosystem;data trust; data lifecycle; data commercialization
	8th Geneva meeting, 16-19, JUL, 2019	FG-DPM-O-172 (D0.1)
		FG-DPM-I-283 (D0.2)	41 terms justified in use
			Consensus achieved of a concept system building with 5 dimensions:governance;ecosystem;data trust;data lifecycle;data commercialization
	8th Geneva meeting, 16-19, JUL, 2019	FG-DPM-TS D0.1
		FG-DPM-TR D0.2	38 core terms agreed upon for common use
			Consensus achieved of a concept system building with 5 dimensional: governance; ecosystem; data trust; data lifecycle; data commercialization

No	DPM dimension	core term of DPM	the code in FG-DPM-TS D0.1
1	governance	blockchain	3.1.2
2		data governance	3.2.5
3		data processing and management (DPM)	3.2.7
4		internet of things	3.1.9
5		scenario	3.1.18
6		smart cities and communities (SC&C)	3.2.11
7	ecosystem	application	3.1.1
8		capability	3.1.3
9		community	3.1.4
10		ecosystem	3.2.9
11		requirement	3.1.15
12		service	3.1.20
13		stakeholder	3.1.22
14		use case	3.1.25
15		use case template	3.1.26
16	data trust	risk	3.1.16
17		safety	3.1.17
18		security	3.1.19
19		trust	3.1.24
20	data lifecycle	closed data	3.2.1
21		data	3.1.5
22		data consistency	3.1.6
23		data management	3.1.7
24		data processing	3.1.8
25		data exchange	3.2.4
26		data sharing	3.2.8
27		interoperability	3.1.10
28		lifecycle	3.1.11
29		minimal interoperability	3.2.10
30		open data	3.2.11
31		personal data	3.1.12
32		processed data	3.1.13
33		raw data	3.1.14
No	DPM dimension	core term of DPM	the code in FG-DPM-TS D0.1
34		shared data	3.1.21
35		thing	3.1.23
36	data commercialization	content owner	3.2.2
37		data commercialization	3.2.3
38		data marketplace	3.2.6

No	DPM dimension	core term of DPM	the code in FG-DPM-TS D0.1
1	governance	blockchain	3.1.2
2		data governance	3.2.5
3		data processing and management (DPM)	3.2.7
4		internet of things	3.1.9
5		scenario	3.1.18
6		smart cities and communities (SC&C)	3.2.11
7	ecosystem	application	3.1.1
8		capability	3.1.3
9		community	3.1.4
10		ecosystem	3.2.9
11		requirement	3.1.15
12		service	3.1.20
13		stakeholder	3.1.22
14		use case	3.1.25
15		use case template	3.1.26
16	data trust	risk	3.1.16
17		safety	3.1.17
18		security	3.1.19
19		trust	3.1.24
20	data lifecycle	closed data	3.2.1
21		data	3.1.5
22		data consistency	3.1.6
23		data management	3.1.7
24		data processing	3.1.8
25		data exchange	3.2.4
26		data sharing	3.2.8
27		interoperability	3.1.10
28		lifecycle	3.1.11
29		minimal interoperability	3.2.10
30		open data	3.2.11
31		personal data	3.1.12
32		processed data	3.1.13
33		raw data	3.1.14
No	DPM dimension	core term of DPM	the code in FG-DPM-TS D0.1
34		shared data	3.1.21
35		thing	3.1.23
36	data commercialization	content owner	3.2.2
37		data commercialization	3.2.3
38		data marketplace	3.2.6

DPM viewpoints	multi-dimensional component	considerations about capabilities for DPM
as a whole	governance	collaborative innovation focus: coordination, cooperation, connectivity; social, digital and physical aspects; multi-dimensional considerations (All WGs)
macro-level-arrangement (Strategic layer, top-down)	ecosystem	people-centric focus: sustainable development; multi-stakeholders’ interests and concerns; various factors impacts’ considerations
micro-level-artefacts (operational layer, bottom-up)	data trust	people-centric focus: security, privacy and governance supporting enablers for trusted data data quality management for trusted data blockchain enablers for trusted data
	data lifecycle	process focus: data processing and use cases data interoperability data attributes and data types data exchange and sharing data model
	data commercialisation	productivity focus: data economy

物联网和智慧城市数据处理与管理概念体系构建——以ITU-T 数据处理与管理焦点组标准化项目为例

Concept System Building for Data Processing and Management for IoT and Smart Cities and Communities: Case from ITU-T FG-DPM Projects

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 19

参考文献 18

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

deliverables (all WGs in FG-DPM)	statistics for term usage (unit: term)
D0.2	2 terms/38
D1.1	11 terms/38
D2.1	33 terms/38
D3.2	2 term/38
D3.3	3 terms/38
D3.5	7 terms/38
D3.6	8 terms/38
D3.7	9 terms/38
D3.8	12 terms/38
D4.1	7 terms/38
D4.3	3 terms/38
D4.4	2 terms/38
D5.1	6 terms/38

[1]	王琪. 中国术语事业发展概况及思考[J]. 中国科技术语, 2021, 23(4): 3-7.
[2]	安小米, 魏玮, 闵京华. ISO、IEC和ITU-T智慧城市定义分析[J]. 中国科技术语, 2021, 23(4): 65-79.
[3]	邱碧华/编译. 欧洲技术交流协会对德国企业术语工作状况的调研报告[J]. 中国科技术语, 2019, 21(2): 26-31.
[4]	“国外术语立法现状研究”课题组, 刘和平, 许明. 国外术语工作及术语立法现状研究概述[J]. 中国科技术语, 2017, 19(1): 7-14.
[5]	宋子寿. 科技术语中的借喻和隐喻[J]. 中国科技术语, 2009, 11(2): 8-10.
[6]	梁爱林. 从术语的价值看术语工作(一)[J]. 中国科技术语, 2009, 11(2): 11-15.