中国科技术语 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 11-16.doi: 10.12339/j.issn.1673-8578.2025.05.002

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

新中国成立初期术语规划评析

王琪()   

  1. 全国科学技术名词审定委员会, 北京 100717
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-07 出版日期:2025-09-01 发布日期:2025-09-01
  • 作者简介:

    王琪(1980—),女,湖北武汉人,博士,全国科学技术名词审定委员会副编审,研究方向为术语学、术语史。通信方式:

  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金2021年度后期资助项目“新中国成立初期术语规范化实践与研究”(21FYYB006)

Review of Terminology Planning in the Early Days of the People’s Republic of China

WANG Qi()   

  • Received:2025-05-07 Online:2025-09-01 Published:2025-09-01

摘要:

新中国成立初期,学术名词统一工作委员会和中国科学院编译出版委员会先后主导术语工作。影响新中国成立初期术语工作机构成立及变更的因素主要有科技因素、政策因素、历史因素及认识水平。从工作内容来看,中国科学院编译出版委员会延续了学术名词统一工作委员会的工作内容,又做了适度调整。新中国成立初期的术语规划归属较为模糊,既未纳入语言规划,也未纳入科技规划,其制定和实施具有相对独立性。其特点有三:一是术语规划的制定尚未形成完整的层级和体系;二是学科界限影响了术语规划的制定和术语工作水平的提升;三是中国科学院成为术语规划的中坚力量。

关键词: 术语规划, 语言规划, 科技规划

Abstract:

In the early days of the People’s Republic of China,terminology work was primarily led by the Working Committee for the Unification of Academic Terms(WCUAT,学术名词统一工作委员会) and later the Compilation and Publication Committee of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(CPCCAS,中国科学院编译出版委员会).The establishment and evolution of terminology-related institutions during this period were mainly driven by technological,political,historical,and cognitive factors.In terms of work content,the CPCCAS inherited and moderately adjusted the work initiated by the WCUAT.Terminology planning during this era remained relatively ambiguous in institutional alignment,neither fully integrated into language planning nor science and technology planning,and its formulation and implementation exhibited a degree of independence.The characteristics can be summarized into three key points:First,a lack of hierarchical or systematic framework for terminology development;Second,disciplinary boundaries limiting the scope and quality of terminology work;Third,the Chinese Academy of Sciences emerging as the backbone force in terminology standardization.

Key words: terminology planning, language planning, science and technology planning