中国科技术语 ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 61-65.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2017.01.014

• 术语辨析 • 上一篇    下一篇

“自主知识产权”的术语身份探讨——基于术语描写论的解读

郑安文   

  1. 安徽工业大学外语学院,安徽马鞍山 243032
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-21 修回日期:2017-01-12 出版日期:2017-02-20 发布日期:2017-02-20
  • 作者简介:郑安文(1972—),男,硕士,安徽工业大学外语学院副教授,研究方向为术语翻译。通信方式: zhenganwen@ahut.edu.cn。

Discussion on the Term Identity of Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights from the Perspective of Descriptive Terminology

ZHENG Anwen   

  • Received:2016-02-21 Revised:2017-01-12 Online:2017-02-20 Published:2017-02-20

摘要:

有关“自主知识产权”术语身份以及概念内涵的质疑是基于术语规定论提出的,文章尝试从术语描写论的角度,对相关质疑产生的客观原因提出自己的解释。对比分析了“知识产权”与“自主知识产权”概念内涵与适用领域,认为这两个概念虽然存在着密切的联系,但既不是同义术语,也不是包含关系。“自主知识产权”是一个政策术语而非通常人们认为的法律术语。

关键词: 自主知识产权, 知识产权, 术语规定论, 术语描写论

Abstract:

Based on prescriptive opinions, this paper attempts to give a descriptive explanation on the term identity of indigenous intellectual property rights. The author holds that “indigenous intellectual property rights” and “intellectual property rights” are neither synonymous terms nor in an inclusion relation, regardless of the common ground in conceptual meaning. The phrase, indigenous intellectual property rights,is not a legal term, instead, it is a policy term.

Key words: indigenous intellectual property rights, intellectual property rights, descriptive terminology, prescriptive terminology

中图分类号: