谈欧洲学者对国际术语标准化原则的重新审视

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2017.02.002

中国科技术语 ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 11-16.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2017.02.002

谈欧洲学者对国际术语标准化原则的重新审视

邱碧华编译

全国科学技术名词审定委员会,北京 100717

收稿日期:2016-03-02 出版日期:2017-04-25 发布日期:2017-05-09
作者简介:邱碧华(1968—),女,全国科学技术名词审定委员会副编审。2003年底到2005年初,在奥地利维也纳大学学习,主要研究术语学等。通信方式:qiubh@cnctst.cn。

Comments on the Reexamination on the Principles of International Terminology Standardization in Europe

QIU Bihua

Received:2016-03-02 Online:2017-04-25 Published:2017-05-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

20世纪90年代以来,普通术语学作为一种传统理论愈来愈受到多方面的挑战,术语学作为一门独立的学科,有被理论蓬勃发展的专业词典编纂学或知识工程吸收掉的危险。“本体术语学”这一理论范式的出现,验证了维斯特普通术语学理论的科学性本质,也巩固了术语学作为一门独立学科存在的学科地位。罗什教授和他的研究小组对ISO 704和ISO 1087以及国际术语手册进行了科学性审视,为重新修订和完善国际术语标准并使其符合时代要求做出了贡献。文章旨在介绍其审视过程,为深入理解国际术语原则提供途径。

关键词: 国际术语标准, 逻辑, 知识论, 知识本体, 本体术语学

Abstract:

Since the 1990s, the General Theory of Terminology (GTT) has been facing more and more challenges. Terminology as an independent discipline is at the risk of being absorbed by vigorous developing theoretical paradigms appeared in the lexicography field or in knowledge engineering. In recent years, the emergence of a new terminology theoretical paradigm, Ontoterminology, has verified that reasonable and scientific elements of GTT, and also strengthened the status of Terminology as an independent discipline. Professor Roche and his team gave a scientific examination on the ISO 704 and ISO 1087 as well as on International Handbook of Terminology on the basis of “ontoterminology”, which is a marvelous contribution to the development of Terminology. This paper aims to introduce this examination process, and tried to provide a way to understand the international terminology principles much better.

Key words: International Terminology Standards, logic, the theory of knowledge, ontology, ontoterminology

中图分类号:

C04
H083

邱碧华编译. 谈欧洲学者对国际术语标准化原则的重新审视[J]. 中国科技术语, 2017, 19(2): 11-16.

QIU Bihua. Comments on the Reexamination on the Principles of International Terminology Standardization in Europe[J]. China Terminology, 2017, 19(2): 11-16.

参考文献 7

[1]	why is terminology your passion?-interview with Christophe Roche. [OL].(2014-01-22)[2015-12-24].http://termcoord.eu/termania/why-is-termonology-your-passion/interview-christophe-roche/.
[2]	Sageder D. Terminology today: a science, an art or a practice? Some aspects on Terminology and its development[J]. Brno Studies in English, 2010,46(1):10-56.
[3]	邱碧华. 维斯特的“世界话语”研究及对普通术语学的影响[J]. 中国科技术语, 2011(2):8-15.
[4]	Roche C. Faut-il revisiter les Principes terminologiques?[OL]. [2016-01-17].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228518708_Faut-il_revisiter_les_Principes_terminologiques.
[5]	ISO 704:2009.Terminology work-Principles and methods[OL].(2012-12-15)[2016-01-17]. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=48109.
[6]	Felber H.Terminology Manual[OL]. (2012-10-05) [2016-02-07]. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0006/000620/062044EB.pdf.
[7]	ISO 1087-1:2000. Terminology work-Vocabulary-Part 1: Theory and application[OL].(2012-10-05)[2016-02-10].https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:1087:-1:ed-1:en.

谈欧洲学者对国际术语标准化原则的重新审视

Comments on the Reexamination on the Principles of International Terminology Standardization in Europe

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 7

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宁海霖. 面向汽车工程翻译的可视化知识服务平台构建[J]. 中国科技术语, 2020, 22(1): 21-25.
[2]	冯婷婷, 胡翠娥. 《国富论》溯源与内涵分析[J]. 中国科技术语, 2019, 21(4): 59-64.
[3]	邱碧华/编译. 话“术语哲学”[J]. 中国科技术语, 2018, 20(6): 22-27.
[4]	祁琪, 张克亮. 面向术语翻译的南海领域本体知识库设计及构建研究[J]. 中国科技术语, 2018, 20(4): 19-25.
[5]	邱碧华. 近20年法国学者对现代术语学的贡献——基于术语学研究与构建知识本体交叉的视角[J]. 中国科技术语, 2016, 18(5): 19-24.
[6]	邱碧华. 本体术语学:把术语和知识本体统一起来的范式[J]. 中国科技术语, 2016, 18(3): 20-25.
[7]	江楠. 刍议中医“补”字词组的英译[J]. 中国科技术语, 2009, 11(6): 45-48.