中国科技术语 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 11-17.doi: 10.12339/j.issn.1673-8578.2023.03.002

• • 上一篇    下一篇

三个平面视角下科学术语泛化概念整合与讨论

李向华()   

  1. 江西省认知科学与跨学科重点研究中心(九江学院),江西九江 332005
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-30 修回日期:2023-02-08 出版日期:2023-07-05 发布日期:2023-07-03
  • 作者简介:

    李向华(1974—),男,博士,安徽合肥人,江西省认知科学与跨学科重点研究中心(九江学院)主任,研究员,硕士生导师。研究方向为语言学及应用语言学。主持国家社会科学基金项目、江西省社会科学规划项目、科技部项目等8项,科研成果获江西省第十八次社会科学成果奖三等奖。发表论文20余篇,出版专著2部,主编专业教材1部,参编教材1部。通信方式:

  • 基金资助:
    全国科学技术名词审定委员会2021年度项目“三个平面视角下汉语科学术语的泛化研究”(YB2021024)

Conceptual Integration on Generalization of Scientific Terms from Three Plane Perspectives

LI Xianghua()   

  • Received:2022-11-30 Revised:2023-02-08 Online:2023-07-05 Published:2023-07-03

摘要:

传统科学术语泛化研究侧重于语义视角,这很难解释泛化后术语语用功能的增效和句法性质的变化。实际上,语用和句法也是引起术语泛化的重要因素。这三者的合力可看成是思维整合的过程。通过改进Gilles Fauconnier与Mark Turner概念整合框架,使之可容纳语用和句法因素并将层创空间的整合过程提升为层级结构,从而构建出一个多维度综合性思维整合模型,可从认知角度解释科学术语泛化的多维动因、过程以及语用增效的理据。

关键词: 概念整合, 科学术语, 术语泛化, 思维整合模型

Abstract:

The traditional study on the generalization of scientific terms mainly focuses on the semantic perspective, which it is difficult to explain the increment of the term pragmatic function and the change of the syntactic nature after the generalization. In fact, pragmatic and syntax are also important factors in the generalization of terms. The combined effect of semantic, pragmatic and syntax can be regarded as a process of mental integration. The improvement of Gilles Fauconnier & Mark Turner conceptual integration framework can accommodate pragmatic and syntactic factors, and further upgrade the integration process of blending space to a hierarchical structure, so as to build a multi-dimensional comprehensive mental integration model to explain the multidimensional motivation, process and pragmatic efficiency of scientific term generalization from the cognitive perspective.

Key words: concept integration, scientific terms, generalization, mental integration model

中图分类号: