中国科技术语 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 27-32.doi: 10.12339/j.issn.1673-8578.2025.06.005

• 定名研讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

“非遗文化”误用对非遗术语体系的影响及其规范路径

李传欢1,2(), 刘托1,2   

  1. 1 哈尔滨工程大学, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001
    2 中国艺术研究院, 北京 100012
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-29 出版日期:2025-11-05 发布日期:2025-11-04
  • 作者简介:

    李传欢(1996—),男,博士,哈尔滨工程大学准聘副教授,主要研究方向为非物质文化遗产保护、乡村景观遗产。通信方式:

    刘托(1957—),男,中国艺术研究院研究员、建筑与公共艺术研究所名誉所长,主要研究方向为文化遗产保护、建筑历史与理论。

  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“扩大社会力量参与文化遗产保护问题研究”(22ZDA085)

The Misuse of “Feiyi Culture”and Its Impact on the Terminological System of Intangible Cultural Heritage:Challenges and Standardization Pathways

LI Chuanhuan1,2(), LIU Tuo1,2   

  • Received:2025-05-29 Online:2025-11-05 Published:2025-11-04

摘要:

“非遗文化”这一不规范名词在社会传播中曾一度呈泛化态势。“非遗”是“非物质文化遗产”的标准简称,本身已经涵盖文化属性及内涵。“非遗文化”一词存在语义重复冗余和概念指称不当的问题,不仅干扰了非遗术语体系的科学性、系统性和严谨性,还在社会传播、学术写作与政策执行等领域引发了概念混乱。基于术语命名的基本原则,文章针对现存问题提出规范“非遗”相关术语使用的建议,以增强非遗术语标准化建设,维护专业术语体系的严整性和实践效力。

关键词: 非物质文化遗产, 非遗文化, 术语规范化, 术语辨析, 文化治理

Abstract:

The nonstandard term “feiyi culture” (literally “Intangible Cultural Heritage culture”) has been widely misused in social communication.“Feiyi” is the standardized Chinese abbreviation for Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) and inherently encompasses cultural attributes.The phrase “feiyi culture” is semantically redundant and conceptually inaccurate,leading to confusion that undermines the scientific coherence,systematic integrity,and terminological rigor of the ICH framework.This misuse has further contributed to conceptual ambiguities in academic writing,public communication,and policy implementation.Based on principles of terminology formation,this paper critically examines the misuse of “feiyi culture” and proposes normative strategies to regulate its usage.Our efforts aim to enhance the standardization of ICH-related terminology and uphold the precision and effectiveness of the professional terminological system.

Key words: intangible cultural heritage, feiyi culture, terminology standardization, terminology analysis, cultural governance