中国科技术语 ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 41-42.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2015.06.009

• 探讨与争鸣 • 上一篇    下一篇

“母亲”术语用错了吗?——也析《宪法》中一款条文

刘静静   

  1. 南开大学文学院,天津 300071
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-05 出版日期:2015-12-25 发布日期:2020-05-06
  • 作者简介:刘静静(1987—),女,山东临沂人,博士,南开大学文学院博士生,研究方向为词汇学与词典学。通信方式:liujingjing87625@163.com。

Did the Term “Mother” Misused in a Clause of the Constitution?

LIU Jingjing   

  • Received:2015-11-05 Online:2015-12-25 Published:2020-05-06

摘要: 《语文建设》曾刊登一文,对于《中华人民共和国宪法》第四十九条第一款“婚姻、家庭、母亲和儿童受国家的保护”中“母亲”一词的使用提出了疑问——认为“母亲”一词使用不当,当修改为“妇女”。文章从语言学、术语学和法学视角,论证了该法条的确当性,并认为:《宪法》语言有其自身的法理精神。

关键词: 母亲, 妇女, 语言学, 法学

Abstract: The PRC Constitution has been questioned for its Article 49 “Marriage, family, mother and child are protected by the state”. There argues that “mother” should be amended as “women”. This paper demonstrates the right of constitution through the perspective of linguistics and law, and considers that: the language of the constitution has its own legal spirit.

Key words: mother, women, linguistics, law

中图分类号: