中国科技术语 ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 5-10.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2017.02.001

• 术语学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

语境与现实——对基本术语“标准”“标准化”核心概念的若干思考

顾孟洁   

  1. 中国电子技术标准化研究院,北京 100007
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-13 出版日期:2017-04-25 发布日期:2017-05-09
  • 作者简介:顾孟洁(1938—),男,中国电子技术标准化研究院研究员,主要研究方向为标准化哲理和术语学的原理与方法。通信方式:gumj2013@126.com。

Context and Reality: Thoughts on the Core Concepts of “standard” and “standardization”

GU Mengjie   

  • Received:2017-02-13 Online:2017-04-25 Published:2017-05-09

摘要:

首先在对语言学与术语学进行对比的基础上,分析了术语学的学科特性;简述了“3W论”的要义,指出了“本体论”在术语学中的深层机理。进而以基本术语“标准”和“标准化”为具体案例,着重分析了由于语境和视角的不同长期以来形成“广义说”和“狭义说”的来龙去脉,并解析了“多样化”“标准化”以及“个别级”(即单件定制化)这些相关概念的区别和联系。最后,就“标准”“标准化”面临国情改变和同国际接轨这两个话题,对如何实现相关概念和术语的能动转化提出了两点创议。

关键词: 语言学, 术语学, 本体论, 标准, 标准化

Abstract:

Based on the comparison analysis of linguistics and terminology, we analyzed the characteristics of terminology, introduced the essence of “3W theory” (3 worlds of concepts), and pointed out the deep mechanism of “ontology” in terminology. We also take the two terms “standard” and “standardization”as specific cases to analyze the differences and relationships between related concepts behind these two terms, which generated from different contexts and perspectives at all possible levels. Moreover, we think “standard” and “standardization” are facing changes in national conditions and need to develop with the international standards, and put forward two proposals for implementing the relevant concepts and terminology for the dynamic transformation.

Key words: linguistics, terminology, ontology, standard, standardization

中图分类号: