扫码分享
中国科技术语 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 42-44.doi: 10.12339/j.issn.1673-8578.2025.04.006
• 定名研讨 • 上一篇 下一篇
洪梅()
收稿日期:
出版日期:
发布日期:
作者简介:
洪梅(1977—),女,医学博士,中国中医科学院中国医史文献研究所副研究员,研究方向为中医术语翻译史、中医药标准化史、中医药术语双语规范。通信方式:zhongyishuyugb@126.com。
基金资助:
HONG Mei()
Received:
Online:
Published:
摘要：
全国科学技术名词审定委员会和中国国家标准化管理委员会术语标准化工作中同义词的采用级别有所不同。结合中医药术语标准化工作实践,对两种术语同义词采用级别进行对比分析,比较异同。术语的全称和简称属于术语的表述形式而非评级。将二者结合,给出清晰的分级,便于操作,可以更好地解决中医药术语同义词评级问题。
关键词: 中医药, 术语, 同义词, 采用级别
Abstract:
There are differences between synonym acceptability ratings(normative statuses) in the terminology standardization work documents of the China National Committee for Terminology in Science and Technology(CNTERM) and the Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China(SAC).According to the practical experiences of standardizing TCM terminology,the similarities and differences between the two systems were compared and analyzed.Full form and abbreviated form of a term belong to expression mode of term but not rating.To integrate the two systems with well-defined rating and user-friendly description can resolve synonym acceptability rating issues in TCM terminology standardization.
Key words: Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), terminology, synonyms, acceptability rating
洪梅. 中医药术语标准化工作同义词的采用级别[J]. 中国科技术语, 2025, 27(4): 42-44.
HONG Mei. Synonym Acceptability Rating in TCM Terminology Standardization Work[J]. China Terminology, 2025, 27(4): 42-44.
/ 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://www.term.org.cn/CN/10.12339/j.issn.1673-8578.2025.04.006
https://www.term.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V27/I4/42
)
)
