扫码分享
中国科技术语 ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 58-60.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2016.01.016
• 溯源 • 上一篇 下一篇
王琪
收稿日期:
发布日期:
基金资助:
WANG Qi
Received:
Published:
摘要: 20世纪50年代,中国科学院组织编订名词时,对于“板梁”一词中是否可以使用“钣”字,曾有过一番调整。其实,“钣”字古已有之,并非新造字;但从术语规范的角度来说,“板梁”不应作“钣梁”。
关键词: 板梁, 术语, 规范
Abstract: In the 1950s, When the CAS compiled terminology, there had been some adjustments whether or not “ban(钣)” be used to replace the term of “banliang(板梁)”. In fact, the “ban(钣)” has been existed since Chinese ancient time, not a new character. From the perspective of standardized terminology, “banliang(板梁)” should not be used as “banliang(钣梁)”.
Key words: banliang(板梁), term, standard
中图分类号:
N04
K826.16
王琪. “板梁”一词的规范问题[J]. 中国科技术语, 2016, 18(1): 58-60.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: http://www.term.org.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2016.01.016
http://www.term.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V18/I1/58